Remix.run Logo
crooked-v 3 hours ago

Becoming an E-1 at age 40 isn't a "career path", it's a last resort for somebody who for whatever reason can't make more than $30K/year with the skills they've gained over the last 25 years, and for whom having functioning knees is less important than needing the money.

silisili 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

So they should just age out in poverty and die? Such people exist. To be clear, I'm 1000% against anything resembling a draft, but if an older person wants to, why stop them? A guy in my brother's medical doctor graduation class was 46 years old. Good thing nobody explained to him it was too late and he failed already.

In all seriousness, I do agree about the functioning knees part. But as long as it's voluntary, I don't see the downside.

loeg 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

A career as a doctor has a lot more upside than an entry level grunt.

ncr100 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It seems unhealthy for the sake of our military.

I'm not privy to the decisions about how staffing 42-year-old As infantry men is militarily wise, however.

simoncion 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> So they should just age out in poverty and die?

You referred to joining the US military as an E-1 at the age of 42 as a career path. As an Army brat, I can tell you that it absolutely is not. At that age, it absolutely is a job of last resort.

analognoise 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> So they should just age out in poverty and die?

I like how the options are "age out/die" or "be part of our disgusting military machine", no other options; people have no value unless they've already got money or can risk their blood.

Surely we can think of SOME option better than either of those?

toast0 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

They had 40 years of functioning knees, but it didn't get them to a place where army wages or army housing looks good. If the army breaks their knees, maybe they can get service related disability.