| ▲ | Aurornis a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
> As far as end-to-end encryption, on SM sites (social media or SadoMasochism, however you want to read it) I don't really see the need. You don't see any benefit to allowing people to encrypt their private communications in a way that can't be accessed by the company? It's weird to see tech news commenters swing from being pro-privacy to anti-privacy when the topic of social media sites come up. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
| [deleted] | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gzread a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Meta has a way to read your E2EE messages. I don't know what it is, but if they didn't then they wouldn't do it. There's a difference between E2EE between friends who want to remain secure, and E2EE between strangers in an attempt for the platform to avoid legal liability for spam. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||