I don't know what you are trying to say. I do believe both that AI can make you rich and that one should use AI or be left behind. Much the same way we can say the same thing about internet.

> The other two are just seeking to spur interest and motivation with greed or with fear.

It just seems like your opinion but even in that case I don't see why we are talking about intention? Ultimately the world would be better if one just said truth so there's no excuse for this

▲

throw-23 2 hours ago | parent [-]

If you're interested in truth and not principles, why do you bring up principles? If you're interested in principles, why do you expect them from skeptics but not from boosters?

	▲	simianwords 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> If you're interested in truth and not principles, why do you bring up principles? Principles are not the same as intention though. Even if some articles are biased and have certain intentions, I don't mind if they are principled and stick to truth. I expect principles from both. I don't expect non biased reporting however. I guess you are conflating them. Principles in this case is to own mistakes, correct them and value truth and yes I do expect boosters to own mistakes. Your first two examples don't show lack of principles - they just show bias and intentions.