>It’s existential for us to keep up with the demands of AI and Copilot

if by chance the CTO reads this, as a user of GitHub I would find it really existential if GitHub continues functioning as a reliable hub for git workflows (hence the name), and I have the strong suspicion nobody except for the shareholders gives a lick about copilot or 'AI' if it makes the core service the site was designed for unusable

▲

ncruces 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

AI and Copilot increase the load on git workflows.

▲

jwoq9118 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

For GitHub to remain profitable they have to appease those shareholders you mentioned.

▲

denkmoon 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Why? What is the correlation between profit and shareholder sentiment (besides the fact that shareholders want said profits)? They don't really influence the operation of the business meaningfully.

	▲	kevin_thibedeau 29 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Growth chart gotta go up. Only chumps run a business that makes a steady return.

▲

conception 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Incorrect. They need to appease/trick/threaten/etc those that are paying for their services. Shareholders just demand they do so at the greatest (often short term) rate.