| ▲ | hnlmorg 3 hours ago |
| Telling people to just go without a TV is a little more than a “perceived” inconvenience. The reality is that companies know they can get away with crap because they all get away with crap. And because they all do it, consumers are powerless. This is why regulation isn’t a bad the thing that many HNers seem to recoil at. The real problem with regulation is when it’s defined by lobbyists rather than consumer groups. But even then, it’s really no different to the status quo where businesses are never held accountable. |
|
| ▲ | zahlman 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| > Telling people to just go without a TV is a little more than a “perceived” inconvenience. From personal experience, it really really is barely even an inconvenience. Especially in a world where YouTube exists and is accessible for free from a desktop computer. There's barely been anything good on TV for decades, and the older stuff probably only seemed good because of the difficulty of publishing any competition. |
| |
| ▲ | hnlmorg 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It really depends on the individual. I barely watch any TV and have been like this for the 30+ years that I’ve been old enough to own a display. For a while, I did go fully in with media centres. Even running XBMC on an original Xbox. But I honestly just don’t really care for video content all that much regardless of how it’s delivered. But I also know a hell of a lot of people who still massively prefer watching content the traditional way. As in, not just TV shows, but on a TV too. And I have no more right to tell them how to consume video content as they do to tell me how I should consume the stuff I want to read. |
|
|
| ▲ | j_w 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If somebody "needs" a TV then they might "need" some hobbies. A disturbing proportion of my family spend more than half of their free time watching television (typically while doom scrolling tiktok). They don't "need" TVs - they need to find interests. |
| |
| ▲ | hnlmorg an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | What people don’t need is someone dictating to them how they should relax after work. Besides, it’s not like TVs are the only industry where consumer choice is an illusion. You see the same problem in a lot of sports (I used to fence and there was a great deal of pressure to buy equipment from one specific manufacturer which charged literally 4x the price for their gear). And it’s not just hobbies either. I need a car for family duties and there are plenty of parts on it that can only be replaced by an authorised dealer. | |
| ▲ | acheron an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Evergreen https://theonion.com/area-man-constantly-mentioning-he-doesn... | |
| ▲ | Cpoll an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sure, but you're just choosing hobbies for people. TVs are just one example here. If your hobby is 3D printing, you might've gotten screwed by Autodesk's subscription changes. | | |
| ▲ | nicoburns an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, and it's not just non-essentials. You could easily get screwed by your food production supply chain, or your housing provider. |
|
|