Can you elaborate on what change you would like to occur?

I have voted based on getting particular people nominated within a federal agency, requires the President to pick someone who will 100% be from their party, and a Senate committee that will confirm them

people tend to think "I'm voting against my best interests" without knowing that the agency control was my best interest as it will most likely continue shaping an industry far beyond any particular administration

I could see that happening again with your abstract, vague, and ambiguous idea. Just say what you mean specifically, use your words, so I know if it's something that could steer my vote or not

▲

linkjuice4all 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You had two options and one was clearly far worse than the other. This nuanced-excuse-making and “the democrats also occasionally do things I don’t like” is lazy. Take responsibility for letting the mob take over - even if it was just by inaction.

	▲	yieldcrv 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I didn’t turn 18 in the last several years So the odds I’m talking about the current administration are low I wrote that I have voted for an agency appointment before, and the person I replied to also is suggesting to do that again yes, only democrats use the meme “voting against their best interest”, sometimes this voting pattern includes or excludes them

▲

Eldt 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Very doubtful whatever agency you can conjour up as an excuse will be more impactful than the country wide changed induced by the overall administration

	▲	yieldcrv 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		cute that you think impact is the goal vote in your local elections if the feds aren't involved the way you wish