|
| ▲ | bloppe 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Actually, median is exactly what you want. It strips out outliers. It's the "middle of the pack" person. Mean is the one that would be skewed by outliers. And "the poor are getting poorer" is simply untrue for the last 10 years. They had a pretty bad time from 1980 - 2015, but in the last 10 years, their real income has risen faster than any other quintile: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/growth-in-real-wages-over-t... |
| |
| ▲ | willis936 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | Median says very little about distribution and says almost nothing about how the tails are doing (which are real people that are easily ignored). That page breaks about a second after loading. It's enough time to see the graphic, but not enough to see the methodology for data collection. Can you share how that data is collected? Afaik government sources do not track real income distribution. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | dahfizz 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| No, the poor are also getting richer: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WFRBLB50107 You're looking at what percent of the total wealth pie do the poor get. But the pie itself is growing, and so is _everyones_ slice of the pie. Maybe you think its an inherent problem that some people get a bigger percent of the pie than others. But its objectively untrue to say that the poor are getting poorer. |
| |
