By "apps" this author apparently means "PyPi packages". This is a bafflingly myopic perspective in a world of myopic perspectives. Do we really expect people vibecoding "apps" to put anything on PyPi as a result? They're consumers of packagers, not creators.

I don't blame people for responding to the title instead of the article, because the article itself doesn't bother to answer its own question.

▲

mehagar 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Did you read the article? The author means software in general, not just user-facing apps.

	▲	andrewflnr 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, I did, just to make sure it was as silly as I thought at first glance. You do realize that "The author means software in general" is already a concession that they don't actually address the question in the title, right?

▲

esafak 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A better data set would have been the BigQuery Github stats.