"He proved that if a curve’s equation has a variable raised to a power higher than 3, then it must have a finite number of [rational] points."

This must be an incorrect description of what has actually been proved, since x^4 is a counterexample.

	▲	raphlinus 26 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		My understanding, which is to be taken with a grain of salt, is that there's an additional constraint, not stated in the Scientific American article, that the plane curve be irreducible. The example of x^4 is reducible, it's x^2 * x^2 among other thing. The actual conjecture is expressed in terms of genus, but this follows from the genus-degree formula.