| ▲ | FrostKiwi 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
But that fresh UUID is in the prompt. Also it's missing the point of the parent: it's about concepts and ideas merely being remixed. Similar to how many memes there are around this topic like "create a fresh new character design of a fast hedgehog" and the out is just a copy of sonic.[1] That's what the parent is on about, if it requires new creativity not found by deriving from the learned corpus, then LLMs can't do it. Terrence Tao had similar thoughts in a recent Podcast. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pastel8739 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Sure, that may be. But “creativity” is much harder to define and to prove or disprove. My point is that “remixing” does not prohibit new output. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | locknitpicker 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> That's what the parent is on about, if it requires new creativity not found by deriving from the learned corpus, then LLMs can't do it. This is specious reasoning. If you look at each and every single realization attributed to "creativity", each and every single realization resulted from a source of inspiration where one or more traits were singled out to be remixed by the "creator". All ideas spawn from prior ideas and observations which are remixed. Even from analogues. | |||||||||||||||||