Remix.run Logo
fintech_eng 11 hours ago

They’re not really meant to go up in value.

The main use is just having something dollar-like that you can move around easily. That’s useful outside the US, but also for plenty of people inside the US depending on what they’re doing; especially businesses that have a hard time getting or keeping normal banking (cough gambling, porn, weed cough).

They’re handy inside crypto since you can move in/out of other assets without touching a bank. And sometimes you can earn yield on them, which is part of the appeal (with the usual “this can blow up” caveats).

Also, there’s a reason every company wants to launch one: if you control the stablecoin, you get the float and the rails. That’s a pretty nice business if people actually use it.

If you already have solid access to USD and don’t care about that flexibility, they’re less compelling.

But yeah, not risk-free at all (depegs, issuer risk, etc). And honestly there probably isn’t much real need for dozens of slightly different stables beyond the business incentives.

amarant 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Ah, so we're basically battling the prudishness of VISA and MasterCard?

That... Actually makes sense.. Which is a rare feat for crypto!

Saline9515 10 hours ago | parent [-]

Stablecoins present less frictions, have cheaper transaction costs and less intermediaries susceptible to block them. It greatly increases the velocity of money.

amarant 7 hours ago | parent [-]

What utterly horrendous payment solutions are you using that have more friction than crypto?

The ones I use are several orders of magnitude less friction and most are 100% free. The ones that do have a cost (for recipients outside Scandinavia basically) are still way, waay cheaper than crypto transactions.

abigail95 3 hours ago | parent [-]

How do you have a payment system that is free? Who pays for the infrastructure?