There is good, useful content in this article, but it is seriously overshadowed by the LLM-isms indicating that a nontrivial part of it is AI generated.

I'm obviously channeling my inner boomer here, but as soon as I start seeing the tells of AI authoring, I just give up on the article altogether. To the author, please consider that I and many others want to see your thought process, warts and all, there is no need to hide behind the facade of the LLM screed.

▲

joemi 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Maybe I'm getting worse at recognizing it, but I didn't notice anything that made me think it was AI-authored. What were the telltale signs you noticed?

	▲	duskdozer 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It just reads like a marketing pitch. Using an AI-generated header image gives up the game at the start
	▲	croisillon 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		But Apple has quietly built something else Their reaction? Genuine shock. Hierarchy wasn’t just a bullet point; it was the absolute anchor for the entire three-day session. (and designers) ...

▲

hagbard_c 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I'm obviously channeling my inner boomer here, but as soon as I start seeing the tells of AI authoring, I just give up on the article altogether.

Given that both my daughters - teen and tween - as well as I myself - gen X - have the same impulse I don't consider this a 'boomer' thing but a 'human' one. As long as genAI- produced text reads like empty marketroid drivel that impulse will remain.

▲

thedb007 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]