Love this idea. I wonder, does it work well? I haven’t messed much with this persona-based agent stuff.

I’ve always heard “just tell it to be a senior dev, then ask it to do something and it will give you better output”, is that true in the experience of anyone? Genuinely curious.

This seems like that but taken to the next level with different personas wrong together and with an interface to see them work together, which is fun at the surface but is it actually better than just asking an agent to do something?

Thank you for this, it's a great point. Telling it to “be a senior dev” helps a bit, but it’s still just one stream of thinking. What’s been more useful for us is splitting work into roles like risk analyst, comedy writer, UX researcher, sr. dev etc... so there’s some back and forth. Giving each agent a different prompt or personality activates different parts of the model, which we have found tends to produce better results than asking it to handle everything at once.

What we’ve built is an intuitive way to approach this by breaking work into distinct tasks.

Sometimes one agent is enough, but the multi-agent setup really shines on larger/messy problems.

It’s still early and we’re figuring it out as we go. Really appreciate the comment, thanks again!