| ▲ | dhosek 14 hours ago | |
The gotcha is what happens when TypeWithSomeSerialization is not something you’re using directly but is contained within SomeOtherTypeWithSomeSerialization which you are using directly. Then things get messy. | ||
| ▲ | deathanatos 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
We can't say with certainty how an unspecified in-the-future library might work, so I'm going to use serde as a stand-in. You can implement `Serialize` for a wrapper type and still serialize `SomeOtherTypeWithSomeSerialization` (which might be used by the type being wrapper directly or indirectly) differently. It might not be derivable, of course, but "I don't want the default" sort of makes that a given. | ||
| ▲ | bigfishrunning 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
In that case, wrap a reference maybe? | ||