| ▲ | tasty_freeze 2 hours ago | |
I'm always gobsmacked when Trump says things like, "We need to get rid of all the wind turbines! They are killing all the birds! Look at the foot of any tower and you'll see nothing but dead birds!" Is there a single person who things Trump gives a single damn about the birds? It is obviously just a pretext. | ||
| ▲ | tdb7893 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Wind turbines are also miniscule compared to issues like pollution, land use, windows, and cats. Also you can track migration and turn them off at key times if it's a huge issue (this is part of the motivation for research I'm going to do later as part of my master's dealing with tracking hawk flocks via weather radar). Wind turbines are an issue but approximately 0% of the 30% decline in US birds since the 1970s Edit: to be specific to Trump, funding for bird conservation has been an issue under his administrations and he's weakened things like migratory bird treaty act. Obviously he doesn't care about birds and the bird community is very frustrated with him | ||
| ▲ | foobarbecue 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
And whales, don't forget the whales https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/26/trump-whale-... and the noise causes cancer | ||
| ▲ | harmmonica 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Never thought about it, but that's a great point and comparison. From quick Google search: 365 million and 988 million birds die every year from window collisions (that's US alone). Windmills/turbines: 140,000 and 679,000. Then if you do per windmill vs. per building obviously the windmills are going to "win," but it's the absolute that would seem to matter in this case. As you said, that has nothing to do with the actual preference for fossils vs. turbines, but a great point nonetheless. | ||