Nah sorry, so far 4 of the 9 commit messages in that fork are "cleanup".

And the first two commits are "new fork" and "fork", where "new fork" is a nice (+28204 -39206) commit and "fork" is a cheeky (+23971 -23921) commit.

I think I'm good. And I would question the judgement of anyone jumping on this fork.

▲

albinn 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I agree, I like some of the directions the fork would go and dislike some. The apparent, fork, publish on HN, then change (and the change showing not a lot of understanding) makes me throughly question the legitimacy and long term stability of it.

	▲	dec0dedab0de 16 hours ago \| parent [-]
		absolutely, but i like the spirit behind it. Hopefully we get a few more and one of them pulls ahead.

▲

17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

bjornarv 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

creator is definitely just jumping on this for some clout

▲

ricardobeat 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

based on that, the project description is entirely a lie - there are no bugfixes, new features, or even the removed telemetry here ?

▲

emil-lp 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Commit messages say a lot about people.

	▲	jcattle 17 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		They really do. Let me cite another one from the repo: "fix: updated readme. sorry was so tired i accidentally mass replaced uv with fyn for all"
	▲	nikolay 14 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Branch names do, too!