| ▲ | apetresc 2 hours ago | |
Well then clearly you haven't taken a look at https://status.claude.com. | ||
| ▲ | dathinab an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
At that 3rd party side GH is currently noticeable worse then claude ... Like they are down to one 9 availability and very very close to losing that to (90.2x%). This also fit more closely to my personal experience, then the 99.900-99.989 range the article indicates... Through honestly 99.9% means 8.76h downtime a year, if we say no more then 20min down time per 3 hours (sliding window), and no more then 1h a day, and >50% downtime being (localized) off-working hours (e.g. night, Sat,Sun) then 99.9% is something you can work with. Sure it would sometimes be slightly annoying. But should not cause any real issues. On the other hand 90.21%... That is 35.73h outage a year. Probably still fine if for each location the working hour availability is 99.95% and the previous constraints are there. But uh, wtf. that just isn't right for a company of that size. | ||
| ▲ | bombcar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
This is ... surprisingly honest? The one above is "missing" status page; and most status pages would legally have to be filed in the "fiction" section of the library. | ||
| ▲ | ctmnt an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I get the email notifications from Anthropic’s status monitor, and I think they might be my most frequent emailer these days. | ||