| ▲ | ViewTrick1002 9 hours ago | |
Or just do like the rest of the world. No anticipated clearences to land, you only ever get a clerance when the runway is empty and yours. | ||
| ▲ | naberhausj 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I think this is a good idea. The only negative I can think of is that it will generally involve accepting and responding to clearances on short final. I think adding more tasks to that critical stage of flight probably increases danger a little. Especially for low time student pilots like myself. That's particularly relevant in the U.S. because we have a higher percentage of student and private pilots than most of the world. Overall, though, I'm fully convinced this would be safer. | ||
| ▲ | bombcar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Even without anticipated clearance to land you have to define what "the runway is empty and yours" means. | ||
| ▲ | mememememememo 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Yeah that gut wrenched ATC had to stay on point and ensure the next plane to land did a go around. Scary stuff. Us lot have more people doing SRE ensuring p99 10ms for something frankly way less important. It is a nuts world. | ||