>DDoS is not an acceptable response in any jurisdiction

Who the fuck cares about what the law says? Seriously. The service archive.today offers is illegal in any case.

This is just a fundamentally bizarre context to be bringing up the law in.

Ah yes I can see the misunderstanding: I meant “acceptable” in a broader sense than just legally, but I can see how the use of “jurisdiction” implies law. It was not my intention to just reference the legality, but more in terms of what is considered “violence” by the society, where law is one level you can look at to get an idea.

Then, again: one persons illegal actions do not warrant another persons illegal actions. That’s not how society works, and not how law works.