| ▲ | rogerrogerr 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AI-proof is probably the wrong way to look at it, but there is substantial advantage in being in one of the _last_ to be automated industries. Social safety nets and such are probably set up by the time the robots come for the last jobs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bilbo0s 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
>Social safety nets and such are probably set up by the time the robots come for the last jobs. What makes you think "Social safety nets" will be the solution the élites land on? If we were to wargame out different scenarios, we'd likely find there are a lot of potential solutions to the problem of large masses of people who are not useful to the cause of productivity in your society. Giving non-élites a social safety net is actually one of the most resource intensive solutions. Not saying our oligarchs would not choose that solution. Just pointing out that it would severely impact their bottom lines. More than almost any other solution in fact. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bitwize 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The Canadian social safety net has big enough holes that rather than incur the costs as a first resort, the Canadian government has taken to passing out "are you aware of your options regarding MAID?" pamphlets to decidedly non-terminal patients. There's only one way to AI-proof yourself: become enormously rich and join the Davos class. | |||||||||||||||||||||||