| ▲ | eldaisfish 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I will offer you a realistic answer - the uncertainty and need for planning are the killers. An EV dropped my transportation fuel bills by 90% but even i will admit that an EV is a hassle. On any trip that exceeds the range of the car, we must identify EV chargers, then determine whether they are working and only then can we start counting the additional minutes. In the winter, seeing the range of you car drop by 26% and not knowing where the next working charger is, is the #1 reason why we still have two cars. If i could eliminate one with access to better transit, it would be the EV, not the combustion car. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | BLKNSLVR 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Legit question (and one that I need to answer for myself as well): Would it be cheaper to keep the EV and rent a car for when you need to do longer trips? (also taking into account the additional hassle of renting a petrol/diesel car) Only speaking for myself, I'd seriously consider renting a (combustion) car for an interstate driving holiday if it's a rare occurrence, like once a year or once every two years. It will become an exercise in accounting[0]. My silly-ish analogy is: I don't own a plane because I fly rarely enough that it's not worth buying a plane to allow me to fly wherever, whenever I want. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stavros 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sure, but this is just a temporary infrastructure issue that will be solved thoroughly as EVs become more popular. If you take long trips often, maybe it's not for you, but I personally only take trips longer than 200km or so once a year, if that, so I absolutely adore my EV and would never go back to ICE. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||