> "Give it access to everything, even if it doesn't need it" is not the only security model.

You're using stavrobot instead of OpenClaw precisely because the purpose of OpenClaw is to do everything; a tool to do everything needs access to everything.

OpenClaw could be kinda useful and secure if it were stavrobot instead, if it could only do a few limited things, if everything important it tried to do required human review and intervention.

But stavrobot isn't a revolutionary tool to do everything for you, and that's what OpenClaw is, and that's why people are excited about it, and why its problems can never be fixed.

Yeah, I don't know, I don't see what I'm missing out on. There isn't something I wanted it to do but couldn't because of the security model.