| ▲ | Pay08 3 hours ago | |||||||
It reads almost the exact same as any functional C-style language. Not to mention that specifically for Guix, you're going to be writing the (name value) form for 99% of it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | rowanG077 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
I don't agree at all. Just look at these derivations: https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/src/branch/master/gnu/package... I counted and you regularly see this: "))))))))))" at the end. This is not a language that is optimizing for being written by humans. | ||||||||
| ||||||||