Giving in in any capacity is unacceptable. The GrapheneOS foundation is based in Canada and is not obligated to record this information, so they wont. They have no reason to comply, be it malicious or otherwise.

▲

iugtmkbdfil834 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

Agreed. This is one of those moments you might as well simply say no. For practical reasons too, your users do have options and tend to be the kind that will drop a distribution if it goes rogue.

▲

mmooss 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

	▲	snackbroken 6 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		People who live in authoritarian states like North Korea or California can (and arguably should) ignore the fact that GrapheneOS is illegal where they live and use it anyway.
	▲	applfanboysbgon 6 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		If you want a privacy-violating OS, there are already two big options on the market. A secure OS for people who do not live in authoritarian surveillance states offers a benefit to some people, even if not all people. A third privacy-violating OS offers no value to anyone anywhere in the world.
	▲	epolanski 6 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		As they stated "If GrapheneOS devices can't be sold in a region due to their regulations, so be it."