Letting any GUI application capture all input and take full control of the desktop completely defeats the point of sandboxing and X11 does exactly that.

▲

ceayo 16 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Defeats the point of sandboxing

Sandboxing defeats the point of said applications. If you want your computer to have no functionality, check out Figma. A clickable prototype sounds like precisely the security the world needs right now.

▲

m132 16 hours ago | parent [-]

So accordingly, ActiveX was a brilliant idea and any web page should be able to execute code in the kernel context, otherwise no meaningful functionality can be provided

	▲	FeepingCreature 14 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The whole problem with wayland is this mistaken absurd belief that the security standards of a desktop are equivalent to those of a website.

▲

flohofwoe 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yawn, X11 (and similar "unsecure" desktop environments) existed for half a century and the sky hasn't fallen. I'm tired of that "will somebody think of the children/grandparents" scare mongering.

	▲	m132 15 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It hasn't, but Windows has had its fair share of keyloggers, RATs, and so on, and I think we can all agree that anti-virus software is an inherently flawed concept. The only thing keeping those away from Linux was its market share. With npm malware on the rise, this is no longer enough of a protection.