| ▲ | rf15 14 hours ago | |||||||||||||
We all know why he did it: because people wrote on and listened to twitter a lot, and he didn't like what they said. He wanted to control the conversation that was unfavourable to him. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tim-tday 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
^ that was always my impression | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | overfeed 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
> He wanted to control the conversation that was unfavourable to him. Same thing Thiel is doing for political control: attempting to inherit the religious right from MAGA -perhaps on behalf of hos protegé. Thiel's plans will likely outlive the movement's leader and/or go beyond 2028, it's a race against time to establish his bona fides while the sun shines | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | whamlastxmas 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
He wanted to control the conversation by... buying twitter and removing nearly all existing controls of conversation? How quickly we forget how censored twitter was before he bought it | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||