| ▲ | mikkupikku 11 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iran shooting back after being attacked validates the decision to attack them in the first place? "supposed to be allowed to have." Ridiculous premise. They armed themselves thusly because American politicians have been singing "Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran!" for generations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | brightball 10 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Right. Under sanctions to prevent them from being a danger to everyone around them while they sponsor terror globally and go on TV talking about getting nuclear weapons to destroy Israel. Most of Europe is within striking distance of their current capabilities that they were not supposed to have. Treaties gave terms to limit the range of their missiles. Treaties were agreed to to prevent them from enriching uranium. They violated both. Had they been allowed to continue on their path, we can all expect that we would be looking at a nuclear terror attack in the near future. People are going to react for their left/right politics but the Iranian regime is a danger to the entire planet. There’s a reason that Iranian expats world wide have been celebrating in the streets. Their biggest fear is that we are going to leave before the regime is fully removed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||