I usually avoid shallow comments but I feel like this time it has to be said as a conversation starter: That's a lot of eggs!

Also ignoring the benefits of subscriptions, an estimate in the magnitude of thousands of dollars for extracting egg prices still makes me feel like we aren't "there" yet. This should have been a problem with a much more efficient solution given the advancements in the AI, data analysis and OCR space. I am sort of disillusioned.

▲

sgbeal 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> This should have been a problem with a much more efficient solution given the advancements in the AI, data analysis and OCR space.

There's got to be a "it's a chicken/egg problem" joke in there somewhere, but i'm not seeing it.

▲

egeozcan 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I actually was going to go for the "why did the chicken not cross the road?". Then I wanted to say "because it was in a price negotiation with the author to sell its eggs", but it was too wordy. Then I thought, "because the author had it as an egg before it could hatch", but it was too dark... Then I gave up.

Well, I guess you cannot make a chicken joke without breaking some eggs (I'll stop now. I'm really sorry, but come on, it's Sunday).

	▲	bombcar 8 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You’ve got two weeks to work on this before Eggster.
	▲	sgbeal 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> (I'll stop now. I'm really sorry, but come on, it's Sunday). FWIW, you made an eggceptional attempt :).

▲

tclancy 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Try a different vision model.

▲

wiether 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> That's a lot of eggs!

Less than one per day, assuming they're doing groceries only for themselves

▲

MarceliusK 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wouldn't read this as "AI can't do this efficiently yet" but more like "we're still figuring out the playbook"

▲

f0cus10 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]