IDK… I don’t care.

I think there is an unheard number of people that think vibe coding is fucking stupid and knows it doesn’t work. While also being really thankful for the small task automation that AI nails every single time.

Why does it have to be a world changing life altering experience? Why can’t I just like have a really helpful rubber duck that will find all the missing references or clean up merge issues for me?

▲

shigawire 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

> Why does it have to be a world changing life altering experience?

Because the global economy has been wagered on this

	▲	gexla 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		Is that what they're wagering on though? Everytime I open X, it's all about the first to some hand-wavy definition of AGI is going to win everything, and it's the only thing that can get us through the painful transition period from massive job loss to abundance.

▲

altmanaltman 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Why does it have to be a world changing life altering experience?

Because of the amount of money riding on it to be a life/world-altering experience. A really helpful rubber duck is not worth the cost. The dreams of AGI is. This is from a stock market pov not dev, but market narratives dominate in the mainstream, not tech.

▲

zdragnar 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The cost of growing and running large LLMs far exceeds the economic value of small task automation.

Small, targeted, on-device, cheap to run models make sense in some places. General purpose LLMs that take many gigawatt data centers to lose money producing questionable output don't.

We are finding ourselves simultaneously trying to divest from fossil fuels while increasing our energy consumption faster than ever. What are we getting for it? Slop, sycophantic rubber ducks, and merge conflict Clippy.

	▲	TimTheTinker 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		> lose money I think that's largely a myth. Anthropic charges something like 10x their internal $/MTok for external resellers.