25 states isn't cherry-picking :) geeeeeeeeeeez!

rkomorn 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think/hope they were being sarcastic.

	▲	wakawaka28 14 hours ago \| parent [-]
		No, it's bipartisan and even fucking international. I think there is a very obvious conspiracy to get this done, but maybe it's a big coincidence that governments and politicians everywhere suck now.

▲

wakawaka28 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I was talking about the party. This shit is and always has been pushed from both parties. Even democrat states like California and Colorado are on board. See also, the OS age verification legislation.

▲

cvhc 13 hours ago | parent [-]

TBH California one doesn't require age verification (while many other states do). It only requires the OS to provide a mechanism for the user to indicate their age group and apps should use the information (instead of asking for PII themselves). It's a fake one, but somehow drew most attention.

	▲	wakawaka28 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If that is true about the California case, it is basically a fluke. Lobbyists don't have total control of the legislation after all. It sounds almost benign when posed that way, but it is the wrong solution either way. The better solution is to tell people to install filtering software to block content that they don't want. Then you don't have to worry about compliance of individual sites, personal information, or any of it. This filtering strategy also makes sense for privacy and handling the subjective nature of what is age-appropriate or offensive.