Remix.run Logo
foltik 14 hours ago

You sure are giving them quite the benefit of the doubt. Why?

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/see-the-alleged-tr...

gruez 14 hours ago | parent [-]

>https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/see-the-alleged-tr...

1. "alleged"

2. I'm not sure what you're trying to refute. I specifically quoted a passage saying that they broke up in 2004, which implies they were together prior to that.

3. For the specific claim that Trump's a pedophile, a "drawing of a curvaceous woman" is hardly proof. At best it's a proof that he's a womanizer, but we hardly need proof of that given the "grab her by the pussy" quote.

foltik 11 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

gruez 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Sounds like you don't have any arguments, if you have to resort to thinly veiled personal attacks.

foltik 10 hours ago | parent [-]

Sounds like you don’t have any arguments, besides “I don’t believe the evidence.”

Or maybe “the evidence isn’t THAT bad.”

Or maybe “but someone else is bad too!”