Javascript's delimeter soup ((){([]{})}); can become near impossible to parse barebrained, especially when mixed with indents and semicolons.

Semicolons are just noise. They're absolutely redundant.

Some brackets are necessary, but whitespace/indent languages make it clear there's a lot of redundancy there too.

The goal is to minimise errors and cognitive load. The fewer characters the better.

▲

szmarczak a day ago | parent [-]

> whitespace/indent languages make it clear there's a lot of redundancy there too.

The only purpose for whitespace indentation is to make the code easier on the eyes. A space shouldn't have an impact in terms of execution, that would be too hazardous. It's too easy to randomly insert a space rather than a character.

▲

xigoi 17 hours ago | parent [-]

> It's too easy to randomly insert a space rather than a character.

What are you doing with your code? I never find myself just randomly inserting characters.

▲

szmarczak 14 hours ago | parent [-]

> I never find myself just randomly inserting characters.

Hasn't it ever occured to you trying to insert a space at your mouse but your cursor wasn't there? People sometimes forget to click (or think the cursor is already there), myself included. Characters are easier to spot because they are not invisible and random letters cause compile errors.

If it has never occurred to you, then good for you. However I do not see what the benefit of not using closing brackets would be.

	▲	xigoi 14 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I don’t use the mouse when editing code, so this particular mistake does not happen to me. > I do not see what the benefit of not using closing brackets would be. Less visual noise. And the ability to use braces for other syntax.