I am a little surprised that they openly solicit code contributions with "Invest with your PRs" but don't have any statement on AI contributions.

Maybe the volume for them is ok that well-intentioned but poor quality PRs can be politely(or otherwise, culture depending) disregarded and the method of generation is not important.

▲

KeplerBoy 16 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Tinygrad sure shared a few opinions on AI PRs on Twitter. I believe the gist was "we have Claude code as well, if that's all you bring don't bother".

	▲	all2 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's a pretty excellent take, IMO. Just an undirected AI model doesn't do much, especially when the core team has time with the code, domain expertise, _and_ Claude.

▲

cyanydeez 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm starting to think that if you have an AI repo thats basically about codegen, you should just close all issues automatically, the manually (or whatever) open the ones you/maintainers actually care about. Thats about the only way to kill some of the signal/noise ratio AIs are creating.

Then you could focus fire, like the script kiddies did with DDoS in the old days on fixing whatever preferred issues you have.