I think "written by genAI" should be a bigger turnoff than "written in Rust".

alternative opinion:

* it is possible to write high quality software using GenAI

* not using GenAI could mean project won't be competitive in current landscape

> not using GenAI could mean project won't be competitive in current landscape

why? this is false in my opinion, iterating fast is not a good indicator of quality nor competitiveness

	▲	andriy_koval an hour ago \| parent [-]
		iterating fast over quality (e.g. refactoring, tests coverage, benchmarks, documentation, trying new nontrivial ideas) is a good indicator of quality.

Aurornis 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> * it is possible to write high quality software using GenAI

From examine this codebase it doesn’t appear to be written carefully with AI.

It looks like code that was promoted into existence as fast as possible.

	▲	andriy_koval an hour ago \| parent [-]
		sure, there are bad genAI projects and there are good genAI projects. You can remove genAI term from previous sentence.