| ▲ | jopsen 3 hours ago | |||||||
Do you think launching a dumb ICBM at New York would make the US put boots on the ground. I kind of doubt it's enough. This wouldn't be another 9/11, it would be merely be retaliation. | ||||||||
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> This wouldn't be another 9/11, it would be merely be retaliation The Japanese and Al Qaeda framed their attacks defensively. An attack on the homeland is an attack on the homeland. I wouldn’t put it past Iran. But you’d rapidly see political consensus to ensure the regime is destroyed at all costs, including and up to leaving a power vacuum and humanitarian crisis. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Hikikomori 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
9/11 was retaliation for US imperialism. | ||||||||
| ▲ | kortilla 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It already looks like the US is sending marines over. Any excuse to make it more politically palatable would be latched onto. | ||||||||
| ▲ | bdangubic 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
the war is wildly unpopular in the US (rightfully so) - attacking US would rally the country (rightfully so) and regime would fall within a week (with significant casulties on our side) | ||||||||
| ||||||||