| ▲ | foobarqux 3 hours ago |
| What is a better option? |
|
| ▲ | vinhnx 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| I've been building VT Code (https://github.com/vinhnx/vtcode), a Rust-based semantic coding agent. Just landed Codex OAuth with PKCE exchange, credentials go into the system keyring. I build VT Code with Tree-sitter for semantic understanding and OS-native sandboxing. It's still early but I confident it usable. I hope you'll give it a try. |
|
| ▲ | logicprog 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| For serious coding work I use the Zed Agent; for everything else I use pi with a few skills. Overall, though, I'd recommend Pi plus a few extensions for any features you miss extremely highly. It's also TypeScript, but doesn't suffer from the other problems OC has IME. It's a beautiful little program. |
| |
| ▲ | mmcclure 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Big +1 to Pi[1]. The simplicity makes it really easy to extend yourself too, so at this point I have a pretty nice little setup that's very specific to my personal workflows. The monorepo for the project also has other nice utilities like a solid agent SDK. I also use other tools like Claude Code for "serious" work, but I do find myself reaching for Pi more consistently as I've gotten more confident with my setup. [1] https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono/tree/main/packages/codin... |
|
|
| ▲ | andreynering 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| https://charm.land/crush |
| |
| ▲ | rao-v 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I tried crush when it first came out - the vibes were fun but it didn’t seem to be particularly good even vs aider. Is it better now? | | |
| ▲ | andreynering 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Disclaimer: I work for Charm, so my opinion may be biased. But we did a lot of work on improving the experience, both on UX, performance, and the actual reliability of the agent itself. I would suggest you to give it a try. |
|
|