| ▲ | everdrive 3 hours ago | |||||||
I wish you were right, but Microsoft has a lot of money they can throw at the problem. Right now they don't care about Windows because their money comes from Azure. There are a few concerns here: if people _really_ moved away from Windows that would actually threaten the Azure ecosystem. Further, since Microsoft doesn't care to make a profit (with Windows) they could also just throw resources at Windows because it supports their Azure business. Microsoft can hire talent if they need to and turn the ship around. | ||||||||
| ▲ | pndy 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It's possible that due to Azure success they decided that consumer sector is a testing ground for their exploitation patterns, where they can test out how much their userbase can withstand before being seriously annoyed. And this is what happen, people said "enough" by looking for alternatives. They can throw money to tweak some stuff but I doubt they'll fully back off from pushing for software+services or all this recent conditioning for Copilot. This piece is a damage control but wording shows they won't change. I doubt that in last 26 years we had a company that truly admitted its mistakes - that's not in the "nature" of such entities. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Azure is only successful because of big enterprise. Consumers using or not using Windows makes no difference Two factoids: Azure runs more Linux VMs than Windows VMs and AWS runs more Windows VMs than Azure. | ||||||||