| ▲ | FormerLabFred 7 hours ago | |
Our modern languages are built on it, and it’s incredibly fast, so it deserves to be kept alive. We owe a great deal to the people who wrote it in the 1950s I guess | ||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
> Our modern languages are built on it It's part of the lineage, yeah, probably started with Algol though? Fast I guess is always nice, but I'm not sure that's enough to keep it alive solely for that, at least to me. | ||
| ▲ | mountainriver 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
This thread makes me happy | ||
| ▲ | hedora 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I came here to suggest COBOL as a better fit, then saw your comment a few levels up in this thread. Out of curiosity, does your implementation use CODASYL? (For people that don't pay much attention to historical software systems, most CODASYL implementations were similar to JSON document databases, so going that way isn't as crazy as it sounds.) | ||