It doesn’t matter why it only runs apps most people want to use. As long as you don’t think a “quality” of something is that “it can do what I want it to do”.

▲

colordrops 4 hours ago | parent [-]

As long as you think of "quality" as "something that is not quality". bad logic. There are many systems that are only usable because they are popular but everyone hates them and thinks they are garbage. Market capture doesn't equal quality, sorry, that's a horrible take.

▲

raw_anon_1111 4 hours ago | parent [-]

If I need to do a thing and a product I use can’t do it? Why should I buy it? Does Linux have the software support of Windows? The hardware support?

So what argument could you give Joe Normal about how Linux is better than Windows ?

	▲	colordrops 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's a fair argument as to why someone should use windows. What does that have to do with quality though? You are confusing two things. Whether you should use it or recommend it is not the same as whether it's good quality.