I try new distros all the time and not a single one of them is 'GUI native' in the sense that you can do everything without touching a terminal. Some weird stuff always happens and you need to do a bunch of research to figure out how to fix it. The settings GUIs never have parity with the config files and it shows.

▲

orthoxerox 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Windows isn't 100% GUI native either. Tell me how to configure the IP settings of a Hyper-V virtual switch via GUI.

	▲	NetMageSCW 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Tell me what percentage of Windows desktop users need to do that on a daily basis. Or even a weekly basis. Or even a monthly basis. (Or just open Hyper-V Manager, then from the Actions pane choose Virtual Switch Manager then select the virtual switch and configure it.)
	▲	raw_anon_1111 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yes because that is something most people need to do

▲

Gigachad 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Depends what you are doing. I have Bazzite Linux on my gaming desktop and I don’t even connect a keyboard to it, let alone open a terminal. Everything is accessible via a controller.

▲

tasuki 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Windows is 'GUI native', yet manages to be utterly incomprehensible. I'm a technical person and family and friends know it. Whenever someone tells me "you understand computers" and wants me to help them with their Windows, having used Linux for the past 20 years, I mostly cannot get the task done. This has become better with LLMs, but Windows gets zero credit for that.

What is the benefit of 'GUI native' if things are broken and people cannot fix them?