I'm annoyed that we still don't know for certain which base model they used for Cursor 1.

This feels really rude to me. I have no problem with them fine-tuning open weight models to create their own - they are getting great results, and Cursor's research term should be respected for that. But deliberately hiding the base model they use is disrespectful of the researchers who created that model.

Simon, sorry to hijack the thread, but what is a good way of contacting you? I'd love to pick your brain on an AI talk I'm supposed to be giving soon.