Remix.run Logo
bonoboTP 6 hours ago

Universities (outside a few) just have much weaker PR machines so you never hear what they do. Also their work is not user facing products so regular people, even tech power users won't see them.

0x3f 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Not sure about that. How would a university test scaling hypotheses in AI, for example? The level of funding required is just not there, as far as I know.

oscaracso 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Universities are also not suited to test which race car is the fastest, but that does not obviate the need for academic research in mechanical engineering.

0x3f 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Perhaps but the fastest race car is not possibly marshalling in the end of human involvement in science, so you might consider these of considerably different levels of meriting the funding.

oscaracso 3 hours ago | parent [-]

>marshalling in the end of human involvement in science

Good riddance! But not relevant in the least.

0x3f 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Impact size is not relevant to funding allocation?

bonoboTP 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There are a million other research things to do besides running huge pretraining runs and hyperparam grid search on giant clusters. To see what, you can start with checking out the best paper and similar awards at neurips, cvpr, iccv, iclr, icml etc.

rsfern 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This issue of accessibility is widely acknowledged in the academic literature, but it doesn’t mean that only large companies are doing good research.

Personally I think this resource mismatch can help drive creative choice of research problems that don’t require massive resources. To misquote Feynman, there’s plenty of room at the bottom