| ▲ | Cyph0n 6 hours ago | |||||||
No, because you’re concluding from your experience and a single article that Wayland in general is bad. I am saying that perhaps your experience has nothing to do with Wayland directly, so maybe you should still give Wayland a chance. You can see many others in this thread contradicting the article’s complaints. | ||||||||
| ▲ | geophile 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
I stated no conclusions. I have not tried COSMIC, and I said that it’s COSMIC and Wayland seem to be problematic for people who have tried Pop_OS 24.04. (The one fact I do know is that Synergy, which I rely on, is still working on Wayland support.) My only “conclusion” is that Pop_OS 24.04 seems to be incompatible with having a desktop that just works. | ||||||||
| ||||||||