| ▲ | Wowfunhappy 11 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Could the technophobes please just buy different smartphones? If certain people want to opt in to locked down devices, I think that's okay. But please give me a device that lets me do whatever I want. (And still lets me participate in modern society—I can't live with a Linux phone). Apple's argument for locking down the iPhone but not the Mac has always been some variation of "Mac users are professionals and iPhones are for everyone." Fine! Where can I buy the unrestricted iPhone? As far as I'm concerned, basically every problem could be solved if Apple would put the Security Research Device on an unlisted page of their online store for the general public. Normies won't buy it, and I will. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | SchemaLoad 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You can do that, there are custom roms and open source phones. The problem is banks are legally obligated a lot of the time to pay out for fraud and scams. So in response they won't allow you to run their software unless they can verify the compute environment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dwaite 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We already have that. The market for the "technophobe" (e.g. above average and below levels of security awareness) phone is 100x larger. That means the people who say "I can evaluate the intricacies and impacts of software authorization" have significantly fewer speciality devices to pick from, and those devices may not be worth developers (or regulators) making carve-outs to support. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||