| ▲ | john_strinlai 5 hours ago | |||||||
>However, a lawyer representing the company - which has previously said it won't pay such fines - has responded to the demand with an AI-generated cartoon image of a hamster. >The latest image is not the first picture of a hamster lawyers for 4chan have sent in reply to Ofcom amazing. same energy as the pirate bay telling dreamworks to sodomize themselves. i cant help but laugh at the absurdness of it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | uyzstvqs 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
From last year: > Messages sent to 4chan's press email went unreturned. One of the two dozen or so alleged moderators purportedly exposed in the hack wrote back using their 4chan email address to say that the site had released a "video statement." The user then pointed Reuters to an unrelated, explicit four-minute video montage. A request for further information was followed by a link to a different video with similar content. https://www.reuters.com/technology/cybersecurity/notorious-i... | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | aydyn 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Unlike TPB founders who were convicted in 2009 because copyright infringement also violates swedish law, the 4chan lawyers are correct that they are breaking no U.S. law. 1A provides broad protections. | ||||||||