| ▲ | Peritract 3 hours ago | |
It's the exact same complaint as in the article: > I started noticing patterns. The quality wasn't there. The descriptions had a templated, mechanical feel. And something subtler was missing: the excitement. The article has mechanically correct prose; that's not the same as well-written, and that's the topic of the article itself. | ||
| ▲ | statements 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Conflicted as to whether I should be more offended at the accusation of using AI to 'filter' my article or because my writing reads as 'templated and mechanical' There is enough here to have a micro existential crisis. | ||
| ▲ | warkdarrior an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> The article has mechanically correct prose; that's not the same as well-written, and that's the topic of the article itself. There is no requirement that an article's writing style aligns with the article's topic. Substance over style and all that. | ||