| ▲ | Maxion 9 hours ago |
| These tools are open source, if they lock them down the community will just fork them. |
|
| ▲ | pjmlp 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Nice idea in theory, in practice is how many folks down in Nebraska are going to show up. |
| |
| ▲ | MangoCoffee 13 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | isn't that's the point of open source software? like when Oracle bought Sun. someone forked mysql and created mariadb. | |
| ▲ | zem 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | as someone who works in the python tooling space I think you underestimate the number of people who would be willing to do this. i would personally help maintain a community fork of ruff if it got to the point where one was needed, though I draw the line at moving to nebraska first. | | |
| ▲ | pjmlp 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | It is proven by the amount of projects that eventually falled by the wayside after the first wave of volunteers run out of steam to keep it going post-fork. | | |
| ▲ | zem an hour ago | parent [-] | | that is a fair point, but I also believe that that happens when the project gets superseded by something better. I do not think ruff or uv will die because people went back to earlier solutions, if openai does kill them and the community fork runs out of steam it will be because someone made an even better tool, possibly incorporating the lessons learnt from astral's efforts. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | hijodelsol 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| This might be true for uv and ruff, and hopefully that will happen. But pyx is a platform with associated hosting and if successful would lock people into the Astral ecosystem, even if the code itself was open source. |
