| |
| ▲ | dcreager 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I've been in the industry for similarly long, and I understand and sympathize with this view. All I can say is that _right now_, we're committed to maintaining our open-source tools with the same level of effort, care, and attention to detail as before. That does not change with this acquisition. No one can guarantee how motives, incentives, and decisions might change years down the line. But that's why we bake optionality into it with the tools being permissively licensed. That makes the worst-case scenarios have the shape of "fork and move on", and not "software disappears forever". | | |
| ▲ | Rapzid 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > All I can say is that _right now_ I've also been in the industry for similarly long and I believe you 100% that's "all you can say" ;) | |
| ▲ | wiseowise 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > No one can guarantee how motives, incentives, and decisions might change years down the line. But that's why we bake optionality into it with the tools being permissively licensed. That makes the worst-case scenarios have the shape of "fork and move on", and not "software disappears forever". Okay, so better prepare already, folks! | |
| ▲ | bbkane 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I personally get a lot of confidence in the permissive licensing (both in the current code quality, and the "backup plan" that I can keep using it in the event of an Astralnomical emergency); thank you for being open source! | |
| ▲ | gib444 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Literally there is no public comment you are allowed to make that we haven't heard 100 times before. Congratulations though! |
|
|
