I don't mean to come across as a snob, or anything like that, but I find this PR really odd.

It's the authors first time contributing to this repo and it the feedback on the PR that was addressed is really odd, like some of it is super basic stuff, even if you're not familiar with the code base or the language.

Just an all round weird vibe.

> “The clang-tidy test failures appear to be pre-existing and don't seem to be related to my code”

I’ve seen Claude reproduce nearly identical comments, wonder if that’s a couidence