A product being good enough isn't enough. At some point you also need to price it, and communicate it's existence persuasively to the market and win market share, and it has to be distributed effectively.

Most businesses fail because they solve for the easier bit (product) and then have no idea about the rest.

▲

RGamma 3 hours ago | parent [-]

"Solving for product" is VC pidgin speak. Much contemporary software hardly solves anything anymore; it's getting shittier every iteration without fundamental progress in the field as everything turns into yet another dumbed down web-based abomination that robs us of more of our sanity (exceptions excepted!). There are good explanations for this, but I still don't like it.

▲

gzread 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The better product is the one customers choose to buy. If products are getting shitty it's because customers want shitty.

	▲	RGamma 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Yes, and customers are less informed than ever. RMS's "useds" (instead of users) comes to mind often in recent years. To clarify, I don't think one should considers it solely the user's fault, because user pedagogy is a shared responsibility, that needs to be offered and taken.
	▲	aboardRat4 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		>The better product is the one customers choose to buy. Heroin addicts want to buy heroin.